Sunday, November 29, 2015

Place of Publication in RDA & AACR2 & MARC 21 Examples

Resource Description & Access RDA

Place of Publication in Resource Description and Access (RDA) & Anglo-American Cataloging Rules (AACR2) with MARC 21 Examples

Table of Contents:
  • CORE ELEMENT
  • How is Place of Publication defined
  • Where are Rules for Place of Publication in RDA
  • What are the Sources of Information for Place of Publication in RDA
  • How is Place of Publication Transcribed / Recorded in Resource Description and Access (RDA)
  • More than One Place of Publication
  • Language or Script
  • Place of Publication Not Identified

CORE ELEMENT: Place of Publication is a core element; if more than one place of publication appears on the source of information, only the first recorded is required.

How is Place of Publication defined: According to the Glossary of Library and Information Science of Librarianship Studies and Information Technology blog, the place of publication is the place associated with the publication, release, or issuing of a resource or document. There are the special set of rules for transcription and recording of the name of the publisher in library cataloging standards, e.g., RDA rules for place of publication is given in chapter 2 (RDA Rule 2.8.2) of Resource Description and Access (RDA). In Anglo-American Cataloging Rules 2nd edition (AACR2), rules for the date of publication, distribution etc. for books are given in chapter 2 (2.4C).
A place of publication is a place associated with the publication, release, or issuing of a resource. (RDA Rule 2.8.2.1)

Where are Rules for Place of Publication in RDA: Look at instruction 2.8.2 in RDA Toolkit

What are the Sources of Information for Place of Publication in RDA: Take places of publication from the following sources (in order of preference):

a) the same source as the publisher's name

b) another source within the resource itself

c) one of the other sources of information specified under 2.2.4

How is Place of Publication Transcribed / Recorded in Resource Description and Access (RDA): Transcribe places of publication in the form in which they appear on the source of information. Include both the local place name (city, town, etc.) and the name of the larger jurisdiction (state, province, and/or country) if present on the source of information.
  • An optional addition in 2.8.2.3 allows you to add a larger jurisdiction if it doesn’t appear on the resource. LC takes no position on this option -- use cataloger judgment.
More than One Place of Publication

Only the first place is “Core.” There is no requirement to record a place in the “home country.”

Language or Script

If the place of publication appears on the source of information in more than one language or script, record the form that is in the language or script of the title proper. If this criterion does not apply, record the place name in the language or script that appears first.

Place of Publication Not Identified

If the place is not identified, supply the place of publication or probable place of publication.

LC-PCC PS 2.8.2.6 instructs catalogers to supply a place of publication if possible, rather than record “[Place of publication not identified]” (remember that the Latin abbreviation “S.l.” is not permitted by RDA). Supply a probable place of publication if possible rather than give “[Place of publication not identified].”

Examples of Supplying Place:

Known local place: [New Delhi]

Probable local place: [Berlin?]

Probable local place: [Boston, Massachusetts?] 

Known country, state, etc.: [India]

Probable country, state, etc.: [England?]

RDA vs AACR2: 3 Changes from AACR2 Regarding Place of Publication 
  • only the first place of publication is "Core" 
  • "[S.l]" is no longer permitted 
  • do not correct incorrect information; instead, make a note to explain
MARC 21 Field 264: 264 - Production, Publication, Distribution, Manufacture, and Copyright Notice (R)

First Indicator
Sequence of statements
# - Not applicable/No information provided/Earliest
2 - Intervening
3 - Current/Latest

Second Indicator
Function of entity
0 - Production
1 - Publication
2 - Distribution
3 - Manufacture
4 - Copyright notice date

Subfield Codes
$a - Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture (R)
$b - Name of producer, publisher, distributor, manufacturer (R)
$c - Date of production, publication, distribution, manufacture, or copyright notice (R)
$3 - Materials specified (NR)
$6 - Linkage (NR)
$8 - Field link and sequence number (R)

Subfield Code
$a - Place of production, publication, distribution, manufacture

264 #1$a Boston : $b [publisher not identified], $c 2010. [On source: Published in Boston, 2010]

264 #3$a Cambridge : $b Kinsey Printing Company [On source: Cambridge -- Kinsey Printing Company; No distribution information]

RDA Examples of Recording Place of Publication in MARC 21 Field 264:

Example of three Places of Publication: On resource: London -- New York – Boston

264 #1 $a London or

264 #1 $a London ; $a New York ; $a Boston

264 #1 $a Red Oak [Iowa] (addition OK, but not required)

264 #1 $a [Place of publication not identified] (Generally, no! LC-PCC PS says to supply a place, even if just the country)

Example: On resource: Chicago, IL, U.S.A.

264 #1 $a Chicago, IL, U.S.A.

Example: On resource: Chicago, IL, USA

264 #1 $a Chicago, IL, USA

Example: On resource: New York, New York

264 #1 $a New York, New York

Example: On resource: New York

264 #1 $a New York

Example: On resource: New York, N.Y.

264 #1 $a New York, N.Y.

Example: On resource: Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

264 #1 $a Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

In AACR2 cataloging it should be given as 260 #1 $a Victoria, B.C. (AACR2 1.4B4 and 1.4C3 prescribes to use abbreviations found in appendix B, in RDA abbreviations should be used only if given on the source of information.)

Example of inaccuracy in Place of Publication: On resource mentioned as: London (but actually published in Oxford, information on source of information is given incorrectly)

264 #1 $a London : $b Oxford University Press, $c 2015.
500 ## $a Actually published in Oxford.

In AACR2 cataloging it should be given as 260 #1 $a London (i.e. Oxford)  : $b Oxford University Press, $c 2015.

Example of abbreviation in Place of Publication: On resource mentioned as: Bs. As.

264 #1 $a Bs. As.
500 ## $a Published in Buenos Aires.

In AACR2 cataloging it should be given as 260 #1 $a Bs. As. [Buenos Aires]


SourceBased on information from Library of Congress, RDA Blog, and RDA Toolkit

See also:
This article is updated in RDA Frequently Asked Questions

Author: Salman Haider [Revised 2016-02-13 | Written 2015-11-29]

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Saturday, November 14, 2015

RDA LC-PCC PS Revision

Resource Description and Access RDA

RDA Toolkit Update, October 13, 2015 - Changes in Resource Description and Access (RDA) and Library of Congress - Program for Cooperative Cataloging Policy Statements (LC-PCC PS) and RDA Toolkit

A new release of the RDA Toolkit is published on Tuesday, October 13.  This message will cover several points you should be aware of related to the release. 

  • Changes in RDA Content
  • Change in Content in LC-PCC PSs
  • Functional Changes in the RDA Toolkit
Changes in RDA Content : Fast Track changes

This includes changes to some instruction captions, but there is no actual change in practice.  There are a few new relationship designators for Appendix I, the term “researcher” may be one of broad interest.
According to I.2.2 Relationship Designators for Other Persons, Families, or Corporate Bodies Associated with a Work: Researcher: A person, family, or corporate body who does research in support of the creation of a work.
Change in Content in LC-PCC PSs

Catalogers should review the following policy statement:

9.3.1.3:  Revised instructions for dates associated with persons to use a $2 with ‘edtf’ in MARC authority field 046.  The PS will now match the DCM Z1 page for the 046.  Note that a revised macro to help populate authority 046 fields will be available soon.

Functional Changes in the RDA Toolkit

No change in Toolkit

Fast Track entries included in the August 2015 update of the RDA Toolkit: http://www.rda-jsc.org/sites/all/files/6JSC-Sec-17.pdf
Changes in LC-PCC Policy Statements in the August 2015 release of the RDA Toolkithttp://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/lcps_access.html

Source: Library of Congress, RDA Toolkit

See also:

Thanks all for your love, suggestions, testimonials, likes, +1, tweets and shares ....

See also related posts in following RDA Blog Categories (Labels):

Library of Congress Subject Headings : Glossary of Library & Information Science

LCSH Library of Congress Subject Headings
Librarianship Studies & Information Technology




New Post on Librarianship Studies & Information Technology Blog (partner of RDA Blog) provides a comprehensive and most up-to-date description and definition of Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH)

LCSH is a multidisciplinary vocabulary that includes headings in all subjects, from science to religion, to history, social science, education, literature, and philosophy. It also includes headings for geographic features, ethnic groups, historical events, building names, etc. Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) is the most widely used subject vocabulary in the world. It is the model for many other vocabularies in English and other languages, and has been translated into numerous languages. The strongest aspect of LCSH is that it represents subject headings of the Library of Congress, the national library of United States, one of the richest of national libraries of the world ... … … (Visit link mentioned above to read complete article)

This new encyclopedic entry in the “Glossary of Library & Information Science” of the Librarianship Studies & Information Technology Blog answers following questions?
  • What is Library of Congress Subject Headings?
  • What is scope of Library of Congress Subject Headings?
  • What is history Library of Congress Subject Headings?
  • How LCSH is produced?
  • Is LCSH a thesaurus?
  • Where LCSH is applied?
  • What is the cost of Library of Congress Subject Headings?
  • How LCSH applies a syndetic structure?
  • How LCSH is revised?
  • What are the different types of headings in LCSH?
  • How many headings are available in LCSH?
  • How present LCSH is different from the previous LCSH?
  • How to use in LCSH the names of persons and corporate bodies, jurisdictions and quasi-jurisdictional entities, and titles as subject headings?
  • Where can we get free LCSH?
  • What are the tools and resources for providing LCSH?
  • How to give LCSH in a bibliographic record according to international standards?

Librarianship Studies & Information Technology Blog will be more focused on Information Access Through The Subject with special reference to the techniques of Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) by use of Classification & Shelflisting Manual (CSM), Subject Headings Manual (SHM), and Classification Web tool of Library of Congress. Librarianship Studies Blog will also highlight the history, development, and techniques of providing classification number using Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC).

Librarianship Studies & Information Technology (LS & IT) Blog is envisioned as an Encyclopedia, Wikipedia, and Khan Academy of Library and Information Science; an authoritative source for consultation and reference for any library or information profession related issue and a treasure hub of knowledge on Library and Information Science.

Follow Librarianship Studies & Information Technology blog in Social Media to be updated of new items and to start/comment on the discussions in the Google+ Community Librarianship Studies & Information Technology and Facebook Group Librarianship Studies & Information Technology.